Posts Tagged ‘sarah palin’

Serious denial

Thursday, November 19th, 2009 by greenboy
Trial by Monster Truck

Trial by Monster Truck

I can’t determine which is crazier – the claim that Obama shouldn’t be President because he wasn’t born here, or the belief by a large majority of Repugs that he didn’t wind because little old ACORN managed to steal 9.5 million votes.

Are they stupid, crazy or does this just demonstrate the success of the big lie technique as applied by Faux News and the Wrong-Wing Media Echo Chamber?  Or all three?

Combine this with the obvious popularity of Caribou Barbie among the wingnut set, and you come to realize that Idiocracy is closer at hand than 500 years in the future.

Maybe we could make the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed trial more popular with the Palin crowd by including monster trucks, flamethrowers and chainsaws.

*Update 11/24/09* case in point:

Goodbye, White Fang

Monday, March 9th, 2009 by greenboy

Although Sarah Palin didn’t get the chance to shoot the nation’s wolves from an upgraded White House helicopter, she will still get the last laugh as Obama decides to pursue Shrubya’s rancher-friendly policy of delisting wolves from the Northern Rockies from the endangered species list.  Although I had thought Obama was shaping up as a Lyndon Johnson, he is now reminding me of Bill Clinton, who pulled the rug out from under Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt’s attempts to make ranchers and miners pay free market rates for their exploitation of public lands.

No consolation prize

Thursday, November 6th, 2008 by greenboy

Sorry Sarah, not only was there be no ‘talent portion‘ to the beauty contest, but there will be no consolation prize either.

More bad news about global warming 10-20-08

Monday, October 20th, 2008 by greenboy

Arctic temperatures are at record highs.  And just for the record, the McCain/Palin ‘solution’ to global warming?  Drill, baby, drill!

It must be nice to be a hockey mom…

Thursday, September 18th, 2008 by greenboy

…if you can afford to wear a $2,500 custom tailored Valentino jacket. Remember what a big deal the asshole Repugnants made over John Edward’s $200 haircut? Their media shills kept that story around for a whole month – but the $2,500 hockey mom ‘costume’ story gets buried.

I said: “No questions!”

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008 by greenboy

After continually ragging on Obama as a ‘one speech wonder,’ McBush has counseled Anna Nicole Palin to avoid all questions and just parrot soundbites from her attack convention speech at all press events. If we had an free and aggressive press, I wonder what type of questions they’d ask? Would they probe into her links with disgraced Alaska Senator Ted “Sleezy” Stevens?

Tip of the ‘Nose to regular and frequent commentor “Kilgore Trout”

P.S. – As if validating the Exiled article linked above, apparently Alaskans still love Sleezy – Palin’s popularity has given him a ‘bounce’ in his re-election bid. Can we strip them of statehood?

Caption contest, 9/5

Friday, September 5th, 2008 by Swopa

(Via Reuters.)

Caption contest, 9/4

Thursday, September 4th, 2008 by Swopa

(Sarah Palin during her speech at the Republican national convention last night, via the Albany Times Union.)

It’s over

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008 by greenboy

Check out reactionary talking heads on McBush/Palin ticket: “It’s over!”

From the Department of Human Shields

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008 by Swopa

Josh Marshall cuts through the GOP’s machine-produced smoke today:

Since there is widespread agreement that the children of candidates should not become topics of campaign debate, it behooves us to note that the McCain campaign has almost singlehandedly made Sarah Palin’s daughter a central figure in the Republican convention.

It was the McCain campaign that announced Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy. It was the McCain campaign, entirely on its own, that dished up unsubstantiated claims about maternity tests and all sorts of other lurid nonsense that had never been seen in print anywhere. . . .

Overwhelmingly, reporters are pressing eminently reasonable questions — her role in troopergate, her lack of experience, her connections to the AIP, her history of earmarking and lobbyists, etc. Meanwhile, the McCain campaign is going absolutely non-stop about Palin’s daughter. It is unmistakable.

Time magazine’s Joe Klein concurs:

This is a smokescreen, intended to divert attention from the fact the very real and responsible vetting that is taking place in the media–about the substance of Palin’s record as mayor and governor. . . . it is important for the public to know that Palin raised taxes as governor, supported the Bridge to Nowhere before she opposed it, pursued pork-barrel projects as mayor, tried to ban books at the local library and thinks the war in Iraq is “a task from God.”

But the Rovian B-teamers guiding the McCain plane crash campaign probably don’t feel like they have a choice. As much as some people may consider a Palin withdrawal inevitable, the McCainiacs are probably all too aware that throwing her under the bus would only intensify the criticism for having picked her in the first place. And for someone running on a vote-for-strong-daddy platform like McCain is to admit a mistake this big would be tantamount to conceding the election.

The only circumstance that could force such a desperation move would be if a stream of continuing revelations — as the media performs the vetting the McCain camp cut corners on — keeps chatter about Palin’s flaws alive, drowning out all serious consideration of McCain’s candidacy to the point where getting a new veep is the only way to change the subject.

To prevent that, two things need to happen: First, Palin has to stonewall the investigation into her abuse of power as governor of Alaska, so its findings don’t come out before November, and second, the press has to be intimidated into silence. (It’s notable that Joe Klein says, “Those of us who have criticized the candidate–and especially those of us who enjoyed good relations with McCain in the past–have been subject to off-the-record browbeating and attempted bullying all year”; this is all about getting the sheep back in the fold.)

And so, to distract attention from the first objective and to help accomplish the second one, tonight at the Republican convention we’ll be treated to the spectacle of an entire political party trying to hide behind a pregnant 17-year-old girl.

If you happen to think there’s something unseemly about using an unborn fetus and its teenage parents as the political equivalent of human shields, well, get over it. Haven’t you noticed that shamelessness has always been an essential part of McCain’s strategy?

Google Ads


Blogads

Categories

Archives

Twitter – Greenboy

Twitter – Swopa