<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Needlenose &#187; ocean conservation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://needlenose.com/wp/tag/ocean-conservation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://needlenose.com/wp</link>
	<description>We Needle. You Decide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:14:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Saving Private Tuna</title>
		<link>http://needlenose.com/wp/2009/04/12/saving-private-tuna/</link>
		<comments>http://needlenose.com/wp/2009/04/12/saving-private-tuna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>greenboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eradication of Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian fishing fleets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiribati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalian pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://needlenose.com/wp/?p=4372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, somebody is stepping up to the looming tuna fishery collapse &#8211; several small Pacific island nations are putting restrictions on tuna catches in their territorial waters.  For me the news would be a lot more welcome, though, if they had done this in league with the world&#8217;s major tuna consumers in Asia and North [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, somebody is stepping up to the looming tuna fishery collapse &#8211; <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/10/MNA016OUL9.DTL" target="_blank">several small Pacific island nations are putting restrictions on tuna catches in their territorial waters</a>.  For me the news would be a lot more welcome, though, if they had done this in league with the world&#8217;s major tuna consumers in Asia and North America, as there are two major challenges facing these &#8216;lil nations.</p>
<p>First, this leaves far more ocean unprotected than protected, and from previous studies, tuna seem to get around.  Second, and just as critically, poaching is a huge problem, particularly when it comes to Asian fishing fleets.  Even the territory being restricted is pretty damn huge, and these cute &#8216;lil countries don&#8217;t have anywhere near the resources to patrol them.  And let&#8217;s say they do come face to face with a serious poacher &#8211; who is going to take the Kiribati Coast Guard seriously?</p>
<p>Unless we can get the big tuna eater leaders on-board with these restrictions, we should seriously consider <a href="http://needlenose.com/wp/2009/01/31/nautilus-ii-versus-high-seas-libertarians/" target="_blank">Plan B</a>, maybe even crewed by <a href="http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=914201&amp;lang=eng_news" target="_blank">these rascals</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://needlenose.com/wp/2009/04/12/saving-private-tuna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

