Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

Caption (non-)contest, 12/1

Monday, December 1st, 2008

“Because you’ve been such a good sport, I’m going to let you stand behind the sign for a few minutes…”

Clear signal of change

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008

Could you imagine King George the Compassionate Conservative doing this?

Caption contest, 11/17

Monday, November 17th, 2008

(John McCain and Barack Obama today in Chicago, via the Associated Press.)

Caption contest, 11/10

Monday, November 10th, 2008
(White House photo by Eric Draper)

(White House photo by Eric Draper)

The New New Deal

Monday, November 10th, 2008

Yesterday, Former Clinton Secretary of Labor Robert Reich wrote a piece for TPM Cafe titled The Mini Depression and the Maximum-Strength Remedy in which he argued that the only way out of the current mini-depression is a bold government infrastructure program:

So the crucial questions become (1) how much will the government have to spend to get the economy back on track? and (2) what sort of spending will have the biggest impact on jobs and incomes?

The answer to the first question is “a lot.” Given the magnitude of the mess and the amount of underutilized capacity in the economy– people who are or will soon be unemployed, those who are underemployed, factories shuttered, offices empty, trucks and containers idled — government may have to spend $600 or $700 billion next year to reverse the downward cycle we’re in.

The answer to the second question is mostly “infrastructure” — repairing roads and bridges, levees and ports; investing in light rail, electrical grids, new sources of energy, more energy conservation.

Government spending that puts people back to work and invests in the future productivity of the nation is exactly what the economy needs right now.

The post triggered a round of thoughtful, meaty commentary from readers (one of the things that makes TPM Cafe a good hangout).

Here were my comments, reposted here so I can check back in four years and see if any of it came true:



Totally agree with everything you say. However, when it comes to the definition of ‘infrastructure’ — I think we should look beyond the classic ‘road-building’ concept.

I would look ahead 30-40 years, think what kind of society we want to live in and work our way backwards to today. What does the ideal look like? Say we’d like to see educated (and nourished) children, healthy people, and reasonably high employment. To get there, we would need good schools, a decent system of food production and delivery, accessible healthcare, and good local jobs. Whatever infrastructure goals we adopt today would have to prioritize based on those principles.

Let’s set the goal at 10,000 news schools, 10,000 new libraries, 10,000 day-care centers, 10,000 new neighborhood health clinics (staffed with people who live nearby), 10,000 parks, 10,000 new family farms who distribute their goods within 100 miles, and 100,000 new small business startups each with less than 100 employees (with tax breaks to encourage buying from supplies manufactured within 100 miles of each other). Too modest? How about 100,000 schools, libraries, etc.

Imagine all the support activity that this will generate across all levels of society. Forcing geographic proximity cuts down on energy use, wear-and-tear of the roadways, and builds local hives of self-supporting commerce. By reducing concentration of location-specific industries we make it so trained personnel can flow between regions and be assured that they can find jobs. We make it so the brand isn’t just ‘Made in the USA’ but ‘Made in Jackson County.’

This will go hand-in-hand with distributed green-power generation plants. If the power doesn’t need to be shunted across a nation-wide grid, you can make do with smaller generation facilities. The more local it stays, the less you lose in transit. Instead of large-scale power generation sources using polluting fuels, we have 10,000 local power plants that use renewable sources, are cost-effective, and can keep going for the rest of the century without ever running out of fuel.

Distribution (of energy, knowledge, manufacturing, commerce, etc) also gets us better fault-tolerance and built-in redundancy. It means that if something disruptive happens in one region, it won’t affect the whole country. Yes, you don’t get the economies of scale, but the goal is to jump-start the ‘distributed economy’ and build a vibrant commercial ecosystem, not to make cheap, low-margin junk that benefit only a few companies.

To be able to pull this off, we’d need training, communication, and good coordination. That’s where high-tech investment comes in. It’ll help spread the knowledge, boost efficiency, and push the benefits down to the local level. Let’s also remember that the Internet infrastructure was designed from the beginning for this sort of decentralization.

As an aside, I believe the so-called ‘Shock Doctrine’ can be harnessed for both good and bad. An emergency can be abused by those who want to acquire power or wealth, or used to ’shock’ society out of complacency and past the petty objections of those who only care about their taxes.

We are clearly in an emergency. Where we go with it is largely up to those in charge and whether they have the vision to look ahead 30-40 years and act now. — fubar.

Fantasy U.S. Cabinet?

Thursday, November 6th, 2008

Shame somebody hasn’t put together a ‘fantasy U.S. Cabinet’ game.  I’d really like to see:

Secretary of Defense: Wesley Clark

Secretary of Interior: Bill Richardson

Secretary of Health & Human Services: Howard Dean

Lots of other positions, including Treasury, Attorney General (Damn you, Spitzer!), Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, HUD, Transportation, Energy, Education, Veteran’s Affairs.

I’d just abolish the misbegotten “Homeland Security.”  Or at least give it a non-Nazi name, like “National Security” or something.  Nah, better just get rid of all those fuckers and any money we are wasting there.

What do all of youse think?

Bush transition plan for new administration

Thursday, November 6th, 2008

Shrubya is promising full cooperation for a smooth transition for Obama’s team.  I bet that means he and his staff are busy removing all the “Ws” from White House keyboards.  Say…all he really needs to do is just remove one “Dubya” and the nation will be happier.  Why do we need to wait until January?  He could just give 2 weeks notice and Obama could start as early as the 3rd week of November!  Now that would be something to be truly thankful for this Thanksgiving!

The Mandate Question

Wednesday, November 5th, 2008

The percentages aren’t final yet, but it looks like it’s a six-point spread with Obama beating McCain 52% to 46%. In terms of delegate count the current count stands at 349-163. If current trends hold, MO’s 11 delegates will go to McCain and NC’s 15 will go to Obama, for a total of 364-174 (for the record, on the DailyKos vote prediction contest, I pulled out of my ass predicted 365-173 — so suck on that Nostradamus!)

In the next few days, the talk will inevitably go to the nebulous concept of mandate. The Republicans, naturally, will be grasping at anything that can bring that into question (never mind the fact that Bush claimed one after beating Kerry by a mere 51%-48%). Since it’s hard to argue with the reality of population and delegate counts, we are certain to hear arbitrary metrics like the proportion of red vs. blue states (there are unconfirmed reports that Tom Brokaw was taking that one out for a spin this morning). This might have probably held more water four years ago:

But even that’s turned weak this time around:

Nevertheless, you can bet that the total land-mass argument will be trotted out, to which we submit this counterpoint:

International Reaction To Obama Victory

Wednesday, November 5th, 2008

To-do list

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008

Blogads

Google Ads


Categories