Needlenose

For years it’s been trendy to argue that in pricing fuels it’s important to use  ’true (or full) cost accounting’  to adequately compute the total cost of fuels.  Alternative fuels, through this reasoning, don’t look nearly so bad in comparison on a cost basis once you add in environmental costs, cleanup costs and the like to the cost of fuel.  The usual public policy conclusion is invariably that the greenshades sharpen their pencils to compute externals, and the government then add those externals to the cost of the fossil fuels in the form of a tax.

So I’ve been reading about this true cost of accounting for nearly 3 decades and while there has been a lot of accounting done, gubbermint has sat on its ass and delivered nothing in the way of the tax.  In fact, under the Shrubya Reign of Error, they larded the fossil fuel industry with massive additional subsidies in a hellish ‘false cost accounting’ variant that could only have been concocted by a coterie of cthonic cretins on K Street.

The BP oil disaster, however, points to a novel approach for implementing at least a portion of applying ‘external’ costs – forget fossil fuel taxes that lily-livered  Congress will never pass – instead, make the fucking companies pay directly for their messes!

For example, the various oil companies could start with a supervised safety review of the other offshore wells currently in production as well as the 27,000 abandoned wells just in the Gulf of Mexico whose capping were most likely never supervised and which may be decaying as I type.  How about forcing the coal companies to put out the millions of tons of coal burning in thousands of coal seam fires around the world that are spewing noxious chemicals and carbon dioxide with zero benefit to anybody?  Or nuclear power plants paying for permanent storage of the 64,000 tons of spent nuclear fuel that will stay radioactive for up to 250,000 years?

We don’t need technology breakthroughs in alternative energy.  We need to eliminate the unbelievable corporate welfare the industry currently enjoys in subsidies, we need to force the companies to clean up the messes they have already created and to have plans to prevent and correct future messes, and we need to invest in conservation and modern grid infrastructure to properly use the power we do produce.

But first we need to break the link between the conservatives and the fossil fuel companies, otherwise we’ll keep circling the drain, faster with each turn of the spiral.

*Update 7/15/10* Could Congress actually be taking action to investigate those 27,000 abandoned Gulf Wells?  Or is this just more ‘look concerned’ bullshit?

The cost of oil.  The cost of coal.  The cost of wind power.

*Update* Tip of the  ’Nose to MIT Buddy: On Faux News they are saying that Obama and the Liberals sabotaged the oil rig.  DrudgeIdiot is calling the spill Obama’s Katrina.  Those fuckers are evil and stupid:

Just how stoopid are Fox viewers?

For some time now I’ve been meaning to write an indepth, thoughful post describing the two possible models for alternative energy development in the U.S. – centralized power production in high-sun regions and shipping the power long distances versus decentralized power production using a ‘next generation’ power grid.

But in another proof that procrastination (sometimes) pays off, this nice SF Chronicle staff writer has already done the work – getting renewable power to the people.

Ex-Soviet Man Buddy took me to task for T. Boone Picken‘s ad for the Picken’s alternative energy plan that’s currently running on the site.  Yes, T. Boone is a reprehensible Repug who helped finance the Swift Boat Pricks in ’04 (amongst other crappy actions).  Yes, his plan is self-serving (as he owns NG and wind power resources) and rather limited.

However, in defense of Pickens, he is showing some leadership on the subject, investing millions of his own bucks and his time at a time when our elected leaders are standing around like clowns in the jungle when asked about the subject.

When I get some time, I want to write an in-depth post about two potential alternative energy futures, depending on the ‘plan’ we follow.  I don’t actually endorse Picken’s plan, it represents the ‘wrong’ approach to solving our problems.  However, what he is laying out is significantly better than the status quo.

Ex-Soviet Man Buddy asked me “If Shrubya started an alternative energy project on his Crawford Ranch in 2009, and wanted to advertise on on Needlenose, would I put up his ad?”  If it’s really about alternative energy, hell yeah!