<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Same tired premise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://needlenose.com/wp/2009/05/13/same-tired-premise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://needlenose.com/wp/2009/05/13/same-tired-premise/</link>
	<description>We Needle. You Decide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBPeebles</title>
		<link>http://needlenose.com/wp/2009/05/13/same-tired-premise/comment-page-1/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>JBPeebles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 23:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://needlenose.com/wp/?p=4472#comment-2229</guid>
		<description>&quot;Global Contingency Operation&quot;? I feel better already. Soo much better to have a STRONG man, one who&#039;s willing to kill thousands of innocents and protect acts of torture.

And you know the next enemy will be Iran. Obama and Hillary will be gumming it up at the AIPAC, deciding how best to trigger the event.

All this comes from the Clean Break strategy which means to regime change or destabilize Israel&#039;s enemies. Iraq was second after Afghanistan. Pakistan is destabilized, to the detriment of US policy goals in the region.

The Taliban offered to give up Osama; we rejected their advances. OBL is not wanted for 9/11, nor is he even likely to be alive.

The Taliban in 1999 made the mistake of not selecting a natural pipeline offer made by a consortium of energy companies (including Conoco), and gave it to an Argentine company instead.

It&#039;s not like we need the oil. Instead the predecessor to Global Contingency Operations, the GWOT, was a strategic gambit meant to deny access to China and Russia. Clean Break has been completed, and the West Bank land grab achieved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Global Contingency Operation&#8221;? I feel better already. Soo much better to have a STRONG man, one who&#8217;s willing to kill thousands of innocents and protect acts of torture.</p>
<p>And you know the next enemy will be Iran. Obama and Hillary will be gumming it up at the AIPAC, deciding how best to trigger the event.</p>
<p>All this comes from the Clean Break strategy which means to regime change or destabilize Israel&#8217;s enemies. Iraq was second after Afghanistan. Pakistan is destabilized, to the detriment of US policy goals in the region.</p>
<p>The Taliban offered to give up Osama; we rejected their advances. OBL is not wanted for 9/11, nor is he even likely to be alive.</p>
<p>The Taliban in 1999 made the mistake of not selecting a natural pipeline offer made by a consortium of energy companies (including Conoco), and gave it to an Argentine company instead.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like we need the oil. Instead the predecessor to Global Contingency Operations, the GWOT, was a strategic gambit meant to deny access to China and Russia. Clean Break has been completed, and the West Bank land grab achieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

